Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Moushoo
Skunk
Atom
Orange-lady
Chip-munk
Duh
......familiar?

And then we say we aren’t judgmental.

I write of language discourse and creation of identities, yet just realized how often we ourselves are perpetuators of such discourses….:S…wweEops too much SS lingo? …it gets to you sometimes yes haha…anyways...

I tend to be bad with names. But if you chose not to wear that torturous odor everyday, spare my nose and try using a Fa antiperspirant, attach more recognition to your identity than the cartoon image of a stinky fish skeleton or a used dirty green sock with gray smokey fumes, I might just consider attempting to memorize your damn name!

'N hey it’s not my fault if twenty four parents around the world chose to have kids at the same hour and name all of them Fatima or Ali. Where is you sense of originality? I’d so prefer Rupelstiltskin anyday! ;D ....(no offence to any Fatimas and Ali reading this ofcourse. I know you? I love you... hehe)

Ok…so sometimes you do tend to remember the names too, but it’s just so much easier to give a name that makes more sense to you. It’s actually a favor bestowed upon mankind. Say if a person who’s a real dog in nature, is actually called “dog”, wouldn't that would make life so much simpler for those around, and save those innocent naïve creatures running around from being beguiled by their deceptive identities?

Naming for the sake of analogy is also as legitimate a cause. What can make more sense than the dorrito vs. namak paara theory when trying to illuminate the credentials, and lack of, between two potential interests? Yes that might involve reducing individuals to a level of objectification where they are being compared to a packet of crisps, but hey dorritos are anything but derogatory.

We criticized to death the Akbari-Askari way of thinking in urdu literature classes back in grade eight… yet insist upon doing so ourselves. We consciously believe in ‘shades of gray’, but when it comes to dealing with people they’re either angels or they have the devil in them. The guy you see helping the old lady cross the road goes on to the golden star list and the one that sticks his head out of the window and spits red eow pan slashes on the pwetty walkway next to the flower beds gets to be black listed. One becomes the sweet-uncle and the other the icky-pan-thook-guy. But that’s not the end of it…there is more to them then you know. I never thought of myself as vulnerable and naïve when it came to judging people. But man, I suck at it! :S

I could never understand Manto’s “khol doa”…how those men could be heroes at one end and then in another instance commit the same crimes they were supposedly saving others from. But very recently have realized it happens all around you. Hypocrisy, double-standards, weaknesses......a complex mesh of incomprehensible weirdness.

So the moral of this immoral story is….naming people for the sake of simplicity can end up making you believe, they are that simple.

Beware of the evil within you.

The truth is out there.

For those of you who read this the second time to actually make sense of it, and those of you who do not like dorritos: you are a sad individual, go smash you head against a wall and squish any remains of those brain cells that exist up there…they are useless. *smug smilie*

8 Comments:

Blogger Sindy Clawford said...

And here I thought reading htings a second time through was meant to be a compliment, but since I would be dead rather than sad, I shall not attempt such a feat.

Dragging bits that I can remember back from my memory then, pan-thook people deserve to be judged on that, so nyah. Especially if they roll down the window and try to time it between passing cars. Those early morning drives to school were such torture, and there wasn't even any pan involved :(

You nick-name people you know well too, but it's still necessary to remember that "Duh?:S" embodies more than just it's two-dimensional implication. Duh is in fact, an entire culture, an entire generation.

And if I've got this all wrong tis your fault for not letting me re-read. SS pah ::)

26/10/05 1:31 PM  
Blogger G said...

men are from mars, women are from venus. its just that simple. go figure

26/10/05 4:24 PM  
Blogger KT said...

We consciously believe in ‘shades of gray’, but when it comes to dealing with people they’re either angels or they have the devil in them.

It is but human nature to exhibit traits than at times conform to either one of those references, not as a purposeful show of the mentioned but as 'give-away's of the more often than not hidden self, if that were to describe it correctly. Whether they be reliable is totally dependant on the observer's perception in either of the two participants' cases.

However, it would be quite reductionist an approach to deal with the other as belonging to one of two practically, not completely, but practically inexistent extremes in life, and that too in most and not all cases i might add hehe

How one chooses to deal with people comes from their understanding of who they're dealing with, and is hence totally dependant on one's own evaluation/critique/judgement, which differs from person to person i guess.

My 2 cents ;)

27/10/05 1:18 AM  
Blogger M said...

Ray:
Hahah *owwiee*, you can read it twiiice ray..but only ray! ;P
The pan-thook men are indeed to be judged, all I say is theres more to them...say that same pan-thook man may also be the groin-scratcher-dude ..so why jump to conclusions...lol
I say: Hail the duh culture!
*bow*


Gauher:
men are from mars, women are from venus.
mars is from venus.
The minor premise negates the major premise, hence the syllogism is invalid!
Go figure.
muahaha ;P


Ali:
And I thought I was suppose to be the SS major! *sheesh*
I see cultural annthropology spilling in. Must go talk to the dean to bAn it for CS majors ..haha
Yes it would be quite a reductionist approach, but in the moment we seldomly think of that. Yes we do leave room for others but it is often after some pre-conceived notions we attach to them on instances that standout like the ones we name them on.
Or maybe I'm just evil ;D

29/10/05 12:29 PM  
Blogger AI said...

Say wha?

So are you saying you're not the pink butterfly who is perpetually smiling and thinks nice of everyone and only bitches as an outlet for emotional expression?!?!

Who'd a thunk it?

Judge from a distance
Observe when close-by
For life is too short
To know everything

25/11/05 6:20 PM  
Blogger M said...

Behold!
...I Lucifer
..............muahaha ;P

27/11/05 2:07 AM  
Blogger Saad F'akhtar said...

i dont like you!!!! if i flunk, i'll hunt each of you down and kill you...all you people praying for my failure!

27/11/05 7:05 AM  
Blogger M said...

We love you too Saad :P hahah

2/12/05 1:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home